You probably already knew this: YouTube is the second most visited website on the internet. In obvious first place is Google.com which also happens to be the parent/sister company of the world’s biggest video streaming site. YouTube has over 800 million videos (and growing) and gets over 17 billion visits per month (source), so saying they make a lot of money on that website off your eyeballs is putting it very mildly. The secret sauce, of course, is the algorithm that keeping must-see videos constantly into your viewing experience, and because it’s Google-powered, you can bet those engineers know exactly how build a data-driven, personalized algorithm that knows exactly what you want to see. Or does it?
One Algorithm to rule them all?
Based on the platform’s success and profitability it’s pretty clear that this algorithm is doing something right, but there is still plenty of criticism and scrutiny on YouTube’s content selection, especially in light of continuing misinformation problems plaguing all social media platforms. If you are a user of YouTube (statistically likely!) you are probably already familiar with the various tools you can use to supposedly tailor YouTube’s algorithm to only provide content aligned with your interests. There are even buttons to dislike, remove from recommendations, or report as misinformation, but according to research done by Mozilla Foundation (full disclosure: a non-profit research and advocacy organization that is funded by Firefox money and search engine royalties from Google, etc.), these buttons are essentially ineffective. My takeaway? YouTube is using the age-old marketing trick in offering the illusion of control, while still driving traffic to the videos and trends that make them the most money. The article is lengthy, but Mozilla helpfully provides an infographic summary that is a bit easier to digest and leads to the true reason they published these findings. In the end, Mozilla is an activist organization attempting to drill some transparency into the biggest content platforms. The only way this is going to happen is if enough people step up and ask for change. You don’t have to stop using YouTube, but recognizing their placebo controls might give you better insight into why true control over your feed feels elusive.
Image by Pablo Jimeno from Pixabay
I’ve mentioned the breach monitoring service “Have I Been Pwned” several times in past articles, and it continues to be a valuable service in finding out if any of my credentials have been exposed in any of the numerous breaches that have occurred over the past 7 years, as well as any new breaches that occur going forward. What’s disheartening for folks like me who have a keen interest in cyber security is that though this service is free, Have I Been Pwned only has 2M subscribers, out of a possible 3.6B unique email addresses in their database, meaning that less than 1% of potential users are utilizing the service. Hopefully that will change now that both web browser Firefox and password manager 1Password will start to heavily feature HIBP lookups directly in their interfaces.
What this means for you
Because they know I manage many hundreds of passwords as part of my business, my clients always ask me which password manager I use. Unfortunately for them, I can’t recommend Passpack, primarily because it isn’t designed for the average consumer. In the past, I’ve recommended LastPass or Dashlane, but with 1Password’s built-in integration of HIBP look-ups and wide availability on all major platforms, it seems like an obvious recommendation, to the point where I am considering migrating our business password management to them. Keep in mind that it’s not free, but there are family and team plans in case you feel like leading the way for your corner of the internet.
I’m also asked frequently about which web browser to use. Up until recently, I was a huge Google Chrome advocate, and I still use it on a regular basis on one of my laptops, but I have recently switched to Mozilla Firefox as my main workhorse browser, primarily for the expanding set of security and privacy features like the above-mentioned HIBP integration and Firefox’s own identity containers which can help to stop advertisers from snooping your cookies and history while you surf the web. It’s also very fast and a bit better at managing its RAM usage, unlike Chrome and Microsoft’s Edge, both of which are notorious memory hogs. If you are considering switching to Firefox, keep in mind that there are still some sites and services, especially in-house business solutions that may not run consistently, so always know where your Internet Explorer and Chrome shortcuts reside in case you need to fallback to another browser. Fortunately all three can safely co-exist, so it’s worth giving it a spin.
Finally, if you haven’t added your email address to Have I Been Pwned, you really should, even if you are afraid of what you might find out. The initial dismay is worth the longer-term gains in security.
Under the auspice of saving battery life on laptops, Google just made good on their promise in June of this year to pause Flash elements on webpages loaded in their browser, Chrome. Though they don’t outright name what elements they are targeting *cough* advertising *cough*, as of September 1, Chrome will, by default, no longer autoplay Flash-based media on any page. If you want to punch that monkey to win a prize, you will have to click on the advertisement to get it to dance around on your screen. Now before you break out the champagne, this certainly doesn’t mean the end of web advertising by any stretch of the imagination – many of the ads you see are HTML5-based (including Google’s own AdWords platform) – but seeing as Chrome has 50% of the browser marketshare, it’s a safe bet that many, many advertisers will stop using Flash as a delivery mechanism, and given Flash’s long history of security weaknesses, this is a good thing.
What this means for you:
If you’re using Chrome as your main web browser, make sure it’s updated to the latest version, and start breathing the Flash-paused air. Firefox users have been enjoying this particular state for a little while now, as Mozilla put Flash in permanent time-out last month. If you are still using Internet Explorer (and many, many folks are required to because of various corporate applications) you can also experience a Flash-paused existence by following the steps outlined in this article.
Most importantly, if your website was designed with Flash elements (as many were up to about 2 years ago), it’s time to refresh your online presence to marginalize or eliminate the dependency on Flash. Its days are well and truly numbered.
Last week’s breach of Italian security firm Hacking Team exposed documentation that detailed the firm’s use of previously unknown security weaknesses in Adobe’s pervasive Flash platform. Typically known as “zero-day” vulnerabilities, these types of holes are being exploited by cybercriminals from the moment they are discovered, and companies will scramble madly to patch the problems and distribute the fix to their customers. Apparently fed up with the ongoing security failures of the plugin and Adobe’s lackluster speed at fixing them, Mozilla has started blocking outdated Flash plugins from running in Firefox, and Facebook’s security czar has called for the troubled platform to be retired:
It is time for Adobe to announce the end-of-life date for Flash and to ask the browsers to set killbits on the same day.
— Alex Stamos (@alexstamos) July 12, 2015
What this means for you:
If you are the owner of a website that uses Flash, you should review whether its use is optional or required, with the latter choice presenting numerous challenges, including alienating a large segment of your mobile browsers; both iOS and Android require special, third-part apps to run Flash that are typically not free. Adding this to Google’s latest ranking algorithm which disfavors sites that aren’t mobile friendly, and you could end up with a website that gets relegated to a dark corner of the internet.
As a website visitor, at minimum you should update your Flash plugin immediately, and only do so by getting the latest version from Adobe’s website. Do not follow links or popups that appear while visiting websites – 99% of the time they are not legitimate and will lead to a malware infection. If you’d prefer to stop using Flash altogether, you can follow these instructions to make Flash ask for permission every time it runs:
It’s nice that Microsoft can keep guys like me busy. Luckily, exploitation of their latest zero-day weakness seems to be limited (so far) to an advanced persistent threat (APT) attack targeting users of a specific national and international security policy website. This particular exploit is being delivered in a traditional “drive-by” attack when users of the English-version of Internet Explorer (specifically IE 7 and 8 on Windows XP, and IE 8 on Windows 7) visit this website. What distinguishes it from past threats is this malware’s ability to write malicious code directly to memory and then execute without writing to disk, a technique that makes detection and remediation much more difficult.
Microsoft intends to release a patch for this vulnerability as early as tomorrow (Nov 12). This is very fast for someone like Microsoft, and may be an indication of how serious this particular vulnerability might be.
What this means for you:
Though the exploit seems to be narrowly targeted at the moment, security researches say it wouldn’t be hard to manipulate the existing attack software to affect all versions of IE from 7 through 10, and any language in which IE is distributed. Assuming you have the leeway to do so, I still recommend using another browser like Chrome or Firefox, which still have a better track record when it comes to catching and patching weaknesses like the above. If you are required to use IE, make sure Windows Update is functional, and that you apply all critical and important updates as they are downloaded to your computer. Larger companies may control how frequently Windows Updates are applied in their enterprise, but don’t be afraid to ask your resident IT representative if they are taking steps to keep Internet Explorer safe for your use.
In case you were worried that Internet Explorer might be gaining ground as a secure web browser, security researchers have uncovered another zero-day vulnerability that is actively being exploited in version 8 and 9 of Internet Explorer. I’ll spare you the gory details but the gist of the hole is such that it can be exploited in a simple “drive-by” attack, and doesn’t even require interaction from the user. Sadly, this weakness seems to afflict all versions of Microsoft’s web browser, including the yet-to-be released version 11. Microsoft is aware of the issue, and is working to plug the hole, but could be weeks away from a formal fix.
What this means for you:
If you are using IE 8 (extremely likely if you are still using Windows XP), or IE 9 (also likely throughout much of the corporate world), there is a Microsoft Fixit that can be applied, and enterprise IT shops can address this centrally if they are running well-managed computer fleets. If you are leery of applying temporary patches and are not restricted to using Microsoft’s browser, you can give Chrome, Firefox or even Safari a try until Microsoft issues a formal patch for this exploit. At minimum, make sure your anti-malware is up to date and working, and watch carefully for suspicious behavior while surfing the internet, especially if you are visiting new/unfamiliar websites.
Hackers have compromised a Department of Energy website, leveraging a previously undiscovered security flaw in version 8 of Microsoft’s Internet Explorer. IE 8, which is now 2 versions back from Microsoft’s most recent release (v10), is used by almost a quarter of all Internet Explorer users, and is most commonly found on Windows XP computers. The “watering hole” style attack is thought to be the work of Chinese hackers based upon the malware used and the command and control protocols used. The hacked website is used by the DOE to disseminate information on radiation-based illnesses, leading analysts to believe that this was a targeted attack aimed at compromising the computers of government employees working with nuclear weapons and reactors, ostensibly for the purposes of gaining access to classified information and systems.
What this means for you:
This is the first instance of this particular exploit being discovered, but given the publicity and Microsoft’s well-known inertia in issuing security updates for it’s older products, there is a chance that if you are still using IE 8 you could be at risk. Microsoft recommends upgrading to a new version of Internet Explorer, but in the event that you are unable to upgrade due to your business requirements or application limitations, Microsoft has issued the following guidance for working around the security flaw until it can be patched:
- Set Internet and Local intranet security zone settings to “High” to block ActiveX Controls and Active Scripting in these zones
- Configure Internet Explorer to prompt before running Active Scripting or to disable Active Scripting in the Internet and Local intranet security zone
- Add sites that you trust to the Internet Explorer Trusted sites zone to minimize prompt disruption
As I’m not a Microsoft employee, I can also recommend switching browsers to Chrome or Firefox. Both issue security updates much more rapidly, and though they are not free of security flaws and zero-day exploits, both browsers typically fair better than IE in terms of overall security strength.
Carnegie Mellon University’s CERT and the Department of Homeland Security have issued a broad warning about using the latest version of the Java 7 plug-in for web browsers, and some browser manufacturers have already taken steps to disable Java application execution until the vulnerability can be fixed. The security flaw is already being exploited in the wild, and can be used to run malicious code without the victim’s permission or even awareness. Oracle is investigating, but has not indicated when the hole would be patched, aside from promising a fix “shortly.”
What this means for you:
Unless you have a really good reason to keep running it, you should probably disable Java until Oracle can fix this problem. Unlike other vulnerabilities that affect specific browsers (Internet Explorer has been notorious for flaws in the past), this particular problem affects all browsers that have a Java 7 plugin, including the Apple OS. Oracle has had problems in the past with providing quick patches for the Java platform, so until they do, the safest approach is to disable the plugin in your browser.
Hackers are now taking advantage of conscientious users who have been repeatedly warned by folks like myself to keep their software, specifically their browsers, up to date. If a user happens to surf to a website hosting this new style of attack, they will be presented with a realistic-looking warning that asserts their browser is out of date, but if they click the convenient link to update the browser, they instead be infected with a trojan that will forcibly change the browser homepage to a site that will deliver a full payload of malware. If the user is unfortunate enough to have his or her anti-malware software overrun, they will quickly have a severely compromised computer.
What this means for you:
You should only ever download updates for your software from the manufacturer’s website, as it’s extremely unlikely for manufacturers to use third-party hosts for software updates. In the above example, users were directed to download an update from a domain “securebrowserupdate” which is something Microsoft, Google, Mozilla or Apple would never do for their browsers. If you happen across a pop-up warning that an update is available for your browser, and you aren’t sure it’s legitimate, close it, then check your update status through the browser’s built into the interface, usually under the “Help” menu. Still not sure? Why not call an expert like C2?
Image courtesy of Stuart Miles / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
A recent study by security firm NSS Labs shows that Google’s Chrome browser still has the best detection rate (94%) for spotting phishing URLs, and on average, new malware sites are reported and blocked by all browsers within 5 hours of discovery, a significant improvement over the 16+ hours that same process would have taken in 2009. Firefox showed the best response time to reporting and blocking new sites at 2.3 hours – more than twice as quick as IE10.
What this means for you:
All of the major browsers have significantly improved their ability to protect users, to the point that there is very little statistical difference in their security capabilities. Many of my clients still ask me if one is better than the other, and the answer is always, “It depends on what you need the browser to do.” I still use Chrome for most of my work, but there are still enough times when I’m working with online apps that only work with Internet Explorer. The most important factor to consider is making sure whatever browser you do use is kept up to date, and that you practice safe and cautious surfing whenever working with unfamiliar websites.
- 1
- 2