Proving that sometimes our Congress people come by their paychecks honestly, a bi-partisan privacy caucus led by Joe Barton (Rep. TX) sent a list of questions to Google’s CEO Larry Page, asking him point blank about several privacy issues, including whether or not Google would allow the use of facial recognition technology on the device.
Supposedly, Google has maintained from the start that facial recognition would never be implemented without “strong privacy protections in place.” In a Google+ post Friday, they reiterated this position and stated that Google “…won’t be approving any facial recognition Glassware at this time.”
What this means for you:
By default, Android OS-based devices can only install software via Google’s Play store. Software distributed via Play must go through Google’s approval process, much like apps on Apple’s iTunes store, so you can assume that Google will be true to their word and prevent distribution of facial recognition apps simply by not approving them. However, unlike iPhones, many versions of Android allow “sideloading” of apps with a simple settings change. Sideloading in the Android ecosystem is well established – Amazon.com has an app store that requires sideloading to be enabled, and instructions for enabling this capability are easily found on their website and many, many others.
Bottom line: this is yet another Pandora’s box that won’t be closed. Facial recognition is a reality, and portable, undetectable devices capable of performing this function are only a step away from today’s consumer technology. Technology (and scientific progress in general) advances despite legal or cultural ramifications. One could argue that society only advances in light of controversial technologies like Google Glass. We are only beginning to glimpse the potential of an always connected and much less private world. Google Glass is only one step in a long, uphill climb.
The upcomign Black Hat security conference features a topic that may give traveling iPhone users second thoughts about using a public charging station to juice up their phones. Three security researchers from Georgia Institute of Technology have built a prototype device that can hack an iPhone through the dock connector merely by being plugged in. Supposedly this hack can be accomplished on the latest iOS update, and does not require any interaction from the user, nor does it rely on the device being jailbroken.
What this means for you:
I’ve always viewed public charging stations as being rather sketchy to begin with, especially the ones that charge you for the service and offer “highspeed charging” which could easily fry your phone’s battery if not the device itself. I’d rather spend a few extra minutes locating a regular wall outlet and using my own equipment. Supposedly the prototype that will be demonstrated at the upcoming conference is too big to fit into a standard Apple-branded iPhone charger, but the designers of the device inferred that stealthier versions wouldn’t be hard to produce at all.
Most modern smartphones combine data and power in the same port (Android phones and most tablets also feature this same convenience) so it may not be just iPhones that will be vulnerable to this method of attack. For now, make sure you use chargers you know are safe regardless of what type of mobile device you use, and avoid public charging stations. This particular cow is well on its way out of that barn.
Dell, on the tail-end of a dismal earnings report that failed to meet Wall Street’s expectations, has been busily diversifying its product offerings in the face of flagging PC computer sales. The fruit of one of those diversifications is coming from Dell’s recently purchased WYSE division, a manufacturer known most prominently for their thin-client platforms, in the form of an extremely small thin-client that can be plugged directly into the HDMI port of late-model monitors and TV’s to create a “computer on the go.” Dubbed “Ophelia” this device is just slightly larger than a USB flash (nee thumb) drive, and will run the Android 4.0 OS natively, but can also hook into virtualization platforms from industry standards VMWare, Citrix and Microsoft. Expected to arrive in July for developers and the general public this Fall, Ophelia is expected to cost approximately $100.
What this means for you:
More and more businesses are turning to virtualization and cloud-based resources, one of many factors that is contributing to Dell’s weakening PC sales. The purchase of WYSE was a shrewd move, assuming this trend continues, and we don’t see a rebound like the industry saw in the 80’s with it’s first romance with the client-server model. Unlike the first go-round with client-server technology, today’s thin clients are more than powerful enough for the average knowledge worker’s needs while still being easier and cheaper to maintain than a fleet of standard desktops. The move to ultra-portable seems to be a natural next step, given the modern workforce’s growing acceptance of mobility, and may be a much-needed shot in the arm for Dell.
Should you go out and buy one? At $100, it may add another layer of sophistication to your fancy LCD big-screen in the living room, or add a valuable and extremely portable resource to your traveling business kit. It’s still way too early to tell, but basing it on Android will give the device a solid app eco-system that will hopefully prevent it from being just another addition to the drawer of lost technology toys.
According to BlackBerry’s CEO, Thorsten Heins, tablets will lose their market dominance in 5 years, to be replaced by, presumably, smartphones like the BlackBerry, and larger monitors. Assuming he is referring to the business space, it’s hard to decide whether his prediction is some parts sour grapes – BlackBerry’s own tablet, the Playbook, was a market failure and nearly bankrupted the company – and some parts wishful, magical thinking to self-fulfill their own business goals, which is to supplant tablets (dominated by the iPad and to a lesser extent Android) with their devices. As is usually the case with controversial predictions, Heins’ prognostications have roots in fact. Apple’s profits have been declining, as has its margins on the iPad, giving analysts cause to speculate on the longevity of the platform.
What this means for you:
Unless you are about to make a substantial investment in bringing tablets into your business processes (and even if you are), Heins’ predictions are likely to have little impact on you. BlackBerry wants to be considered a competitor in the mobile device space, and as they can’t compete on the tablet level, the traditional business tactic one can take in this situation is to attempt to invalidate the competition’s strategy by influencing the market. “Tablet’s will be dead in five years. Everyone will be using BlackBerries,” makes for good headlines, but any student of technology history will tell you that smarter technology leaders and innovators got more wrong than right when attempting to predict the future.
Just when we were getting flight attendants to relax the electronic device restrictions on flights, a German security consultant has demonstrated a real-world hack and takeover of an airplane’s critical guidance and control systems using an app he built that runs on an Android smartphone. Hugo Teso of n.run, who is also a trained commercial pilot, demonstrated the exploit at the Hack in the Box conference in Amsterdam, and has developed a framework and app as a means to illustrate just how poor the current state of aviation security actually is. Teso designed the framework to be unusable outside his simulation environment, but he maintains that his environment mirrors technology that is currently in use throughout the aviation industry. On top of being able to completely own the Flight Management System (sometimes referred to as the “Autopilot”) of an aircraft, Teso’s app, named “PlaneSploit” demonstrated how, once complete control of the aircraft’s control systems was obtained, the actual operation of a flying aircraft could be remotely controlled from a smartphone.
Teso has carefully kept his research private, and has been working closely with the aircraft industry to help them close the gap on the many security vulnerabilities that exist in the thousands of aircraft in use today. Even still, it’s possible that other security analysts could uncover the same exploitable weaknesses in avionics platforms, and perhaps behave less altruistically than Teso. Also keep in mind that the autopilot systems can be manually overridden and the aircraft flown “by hand” using backup analog instrumentation. The trick, Teso reminds us, is that unless the pilot knows the plane has been hacked, he won’t know to take over control until the damage has already been done.
What this means for you:
Unless you are a commercial pilot, or someone of influence in the airline industry, I’m afraid there’s not much you can do about this except continue to raise awareness with everyone around you about technology security. Even though I sincerely doubt we’ll see any real-world plane hijackings via smartphone any time soon, now that this Pandora’s Box has been opened, it may never be shut again.
In an announcement that surprised pretty much no one in the technology industry, Facebook frontman Mark Zuckerberg announced the arrival of both a Facebook application suite, dubbed “Facebook Home” as well as a phone from HTC called “First” that will have Facebook Home pre-installed. It’s not an operating system, like iOS or Android, nor is the “First” a dedicated Facebook phone. Facebook Home is really a set of apps (only for Android phones at the moment) that essentially makes your phone more like Facebook and less like Android.
What this means for you:
If you live and breathe Facebook (and millions of Americans do just that), then you’ll want to give this app a try, but only if you have an Android phone. iPhone users will be out of luck for the forseeable future, as Apple does not allow the sort of access to the base operating systen that Facebook Home requires. For those of you wondering why anyone would want such a thing on your smartphone, consider this: For many, the Android OS is overwhelming and complicated. They just want to make calls, answer email, and connect with friends. These users are looking for what’s known as a “Walled Garden” experience, very similar to the way AOL offered the “internet” to millions who weren’t interested in (or bewildered by) the unfiltered and un-curated experience of the 1990’s world wide web. You could think of Facebook Home as the new “AOL” for your smartphone.
One thing to keep in mind: Facebook’s revenue model is based upon knowing as much as they can about all of their users. By using Facebook Home, it’s conceivable that Facebook will harvest much more data about you, including location data and browsing habits above and beyond what they can collect while you are sitting at home in front of a computer. If you’ve been living your life on the internet and have nothing to hide, and you don’t mind Facebook mining your smartphone activity for marketing data, Facebook Home might just give you the Facebook phone you’ve always dreamed of.
Matt Honan, the Wired writer who had his digital identity stolen in a harrowing cyberattack last year, is back with another chilling article about yet another technology failing to protect us: this time it’s our beloved smartphones. More specifically, it’s the ones we’ve left behind, donated or possibly even sold via eBay, when we upgraded to a newer mobile device. The problem? Even though we may “wipe” the phones, the process may still leave enough information behind for the wiped phone to reveal sensitive information about their owners, including where the phone has been (geographically), what websites have been visited, and even phone numbers, addresses and other confidential data we thought erased.
What this means for you:
Depending on the type of phone you are discarding, and how it is wiped, this may or may not be an issue for you. For example, iPhones after the 3G mentioned in the article are encrypted by default, and if “reset” properly, the encryption key is destroyed, rendering any data on the phone unreadable, even if it is recovered. Most large organizations with a savvy IT department will only allow smartphones to access corporate email and files after your phone has been configured with proper security settings, up to and including an encrypted partition to store your email and any files you might access from the corporate network. Most Android phones should be able to encrypt all data (check “Settings -> Security”) depending on version of Android your phone is running, providing the same type of protection that Apple has on its late-model iPhones.
I can hear you saying, “I don’t have any data on my phone that is sensitive,” and unless you are 100% sure of this, always assume there is something on your phone you don’t want untrustworthy eyes seeing. Even older flip-phones have phone numbers, addresses and other data you might not want to share with a stranger. If you are at all in doubt, hold on to that phone until you can talk to a professional about wiping it securely. If you don’t plan on letting the phone have a second life through eBay or donation, take it to an eWaste facility or event that offers secure destruction. This process renders the phone (and any electronic device, like a hard drive) down to its basic metallic components, completely destroying any data stored in any component. Don’t have access to such a process? Drop your phone into a bowl of water for a day or, as the Wired article suggests, take a hammer to it (wear proper safety equipment please!) before disposing of it through a proper eWaste avenue. This isn’t a guaranteed method, but it will take a dedicated effort that most data scavengers will bypass in favor of the next discarded smartphone that will be an easier mark.
In what many analysts are seeing as another setback for beleaguered BlackBerry, the US Department of Defense has now announced that it will start allowing the use of iPhones and Android devices in a space that was once the domain of BlackBerry devices. In the early days of mobile email delivery, BlackBerry devices were designed for enterprise-controlled security, where as the other email-capable devices still relied on immature internet standards, or like Apple’s early iPhones, completely eschewed corporate control. Because of this, BlackBerry became the defacto standard for any business that valued security over style, including pretty much every government agency around the world.
What this means for you:
Don’t count BlackBerry out just yet, but the count is getting shorter and shorter, and at some point the referree might need to stop the fight. The Pentagon isn’t getting rid of BlackBerries (that would be a haymaker they won’t get up from), but they are now opening up the space for departments to use solutions from other vendors (namely Apple and Android). This is a signal to the rest of the world that might have been sceptical of iOS or Android’s security status that if the world’s most powerful military is willing to consider using iPhones and Androids, maybe those platforms have finally caught (and passed) BlackBerry on the security front.
Industry analysts are taking off their rose-colored glasses after examining the results of BlackBerry’s largely lackluster launch of their OS 10 platform. Original estimates had the newly renamed company (formerly Research In Motion) selling as many as 1.75 million new phones following the Jan 30 debut. Using words like “soft launch” and “modest demand”, analysts are now revising their estimates down by as much as 83%, putting BlackBerry’s comeback into serious doubt.
What this means for you:
It’s probably too early to call it, but BlackBerry really needed a big splash with the 10 launch and to keep surging forward with momentum to stay on par with upcoming anticipated Samsung and Apple launches on tap for Summer. Early reviews indicate that version 10 phones have caught up with the competition, but the technology hasn’t leapfrogged the competition, something BlackBerry really needs to do to gain any footing in this market, as they can’t outspend Google, Apple or even Samsung. If your company is heavily invested in BlackBerry and still supports it for corporate communications, you can’t go wrong with a Z10 or Q10, as long as your IT department has committed to keeping their BB infrastructure current. If they seem even the littlest bit wishy-washy on that subject, or they already support Android and iOS devices, you’ll make a safer investment in another platform.
Research In Motion (RIM), makers of the once-dominant BlackBerry platform, has announced the launch date of its BlackBerry 10 phones to be January 30 by all the major US carriers except Sprint, who has promised a BB10 phone later in the year. Many analysts believe that this launch is the last-ditch effort by RIM to regain relevance in an industry dominated by iPhone and Android devices, and just as many have already counted them out.
What this means for you:
If you are one of the dwindling BlackBerry faithful, there is a lot to whet your (by now, monstrous) appetite: the new RIM OS modern look and all new code-base (supposedly no carry-over code from older RIM OS’s) will hopefully update BlackBerry’s staid, corporate image. However, the new BB10 phones have multiple strikes against them:
- Developers for the “staple” apps (Facebook, Google, Netflix, etc) will undoubtedly develop versions of their omnipresent apps because they can fund the development off the backs of their profitable iOS and Android counterparts, but don’t expect surprise hits from indie developers appearing on BB10 first – there just isn’t a large enough userbase to warrant the investment gamble. RIM has sponsored some recent events to kickstart development, but proof will be in whether BB10’s launch will be a repeat of Microsoft’s Windows Phone lackluster debut.
- BlackBerry’s current infrastructure has some serious redudancy flaws that has led to some titanic outages. Once viewed as the most reliable platform in the early days of smartphones, the series of recent, widespread outages has severely tarnished RIM’s image.
- RIM has been lapped by Apple and Google, OS-wise, at least 2 to 3 times now. RIM is just launching a competitor to phone OS’s that were developed years ago. Unless this horse can fly, there is no way BB10 is catching iOS6 or Jelly Bean in this race.
I suspect that RIM isn’t quite done – they still have a nice chunk of the market, but they aren’t going to supplant iPhones or Androids anytime soon.